Summative Assessment
For this summative assessment, you will develop a comprehensive leadership framework (2,000 words) that addresses legal, policy, and ethical complexities in healthcare concerning vulnerable populations facing socioeconomic disparities.
The framework should include the following components:
Introduction
- Briefly introduce the significance of addressing legal, policy, and ethical complexities in healthcare leadership and the specific issues faced by vulnerable populations.
Situational Analysis:
- Conduct a situational analysis that identifies current legal, policy, and ethical issues impacting vulnerable populations in your healthcare setting. Utilize relevant data and examples to support your analysis.
Leadership Strategies:
- Propose specific leadership strategies aimed at navigating the identified complexities.
- This section should include:
- Advocacy efforts to influence policy change.
- Collaborative approaches with interdisciplinary teams.
- Implementation of ethics training and education programs.
Implementation Plan:
- Outline a detailed plan for implementing the proposed strategies, including timelines, resources needed, and key stakeholders involved.
Evaluation Metrics:
- Develop metrics for evaluating the effectiveness of the implemented strategies over time. Discuss how success will be measured in terms of outcomes for vulnerable populations regarding access to care and ethical practice.
Conclusion:
- Summarize the key components of your leadership framework and reiterate the importance of ethical and equitable healthcare practices.
Document Type/Template
- Word Document.
- 2,000 words
- Be sure to use APA guidelines, including a title page, in-text citations, and a reference list as appropriate.
C3: Summative Assessment Rubric
Criteria Ratings
Writing Mechanics
Sources
APA formatting
MASTERY Only minimal spelling, grammar, and/or punctation errors present (1-2 errors). The overall sentence structure is well developed throughout, and paragraphs are fully developed with consistent style and clear communication.
PROFICIENT Minor spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks minor elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are consistently developed. (3-4 errors)
DEVELOPING Minimal spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are not consistently developed. (5- 7 errors)
EMERGING Multiple spelling grammar and/or punctuation errors present and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are minimally developed. (more than 7-9 errors)
NOT EVIDENT Significant spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are poorly developed. (10 or more errors
MASTERY The use of sources was consistent throughout the document in all areas to support claims and/or statements in the artifact.
PROFICIENT In most areas, sources were consistently used throughout the submission to support claims and/or statements in the artifact.
DEVELOPING Sources were occasionally used to support some claims and/or statements in the artifact, but statements were not consistently supported with sources throughout.
EMERGING Minimal usage of sources present in the artifact, and/or the overall communication lacked appropriate research support.
NOT EVIDENT Sources were not used to support major statements and/or claims, where needed in the artifact
MASTERY Citations, references, and formatting follow APA style guide, with only one
PROFICIENT Citations, references, and formatting follow APA style guide, with more
DEVELOPING APA style is demonstrated with some consistency, but the majority of the
EMERGING Formatting, citations, and/or references, are attempted, but do not
NOT EVIDENT Formatting, citations, and references are not included, or do not
Criteria Ratings
Presentation: Critical Analysis
Build Leadership using Leadership Development Plans
Application
or two minor errors.
than 2 errors, but they are minor.
citation, references, and/or formatting is not correct.
follow APA style guidelines consistently.
follow appropriate APA style guide.
MASTERY The presentation effectively displays the application of relationship building best practices to an educational setting. All assignment details were very thoroughly addressed.
PROFICIENT The presentation displays the application of relationship building best practices to an educational setting. All assignment details were thoroughly addressed.
DEVELOPING The presentation somewhat displays the application of relationship building best practices to an educational setting. Assignment details were somewhat addressed.
EMERGING The presentation vaguely displays the application of relationship building best practices to an educational setting. Assignment details were minimally addressed.
NOT EVIDENT The presentation lacks the display of an application of relationship building best practices to an educational setting. Not all assignment details were addressed.
MASTERY Information on succession planning and leadership development plans are present with great detail, organization, and specificity.
PROFICIENT Information on succession planning and leadership development plans are present and have good detail and organization.
DEVELOPING Information on succession planning and leadership development plans are present with some detail, but not organized or specific.
EMERGING Information on succession planning and leadership development plans are present, but vague and hard to follow.
NOT EVIDENT Information on succession planning and leadership development plans are missing.
MASTERY The reflective paper effectively explains the experience of collaborating with a Subject Matter Expert.
PROFICIENT The reflective paper explains the experience of collaborating with a Subject Matter Expert. The paper
DEVELOPING The reflective paper somewhat explains the experience of collaborating with a Subject Matter Expert.
EMERGING The reflective paper minimally explains the experience of collaborating with a Subject Matter Expert.
NOT EVIDENT The reflective paper does not explain the experience of collaborating with a Subject
Criteria Ratings The paper effectively highlights the application of ADA and accessibility considerations in the Digital Lesson design.
highlights the application of ADA and accessibility considerations in the Digital Lesson design.
The paper somewhat highlights the application of ADA and accessibility considerations in the Digital Lesson design.
The paper minimally highlights the application of ADA and accessibility considerations in the Digital Lesson design.
Matter Expert. The paper excludes highlights on the application of ADA and accessibility considerations in the Digital Lesson design.