- McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
- Chapter 14, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 293–316)
- Chapter 15, “Informatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety, Quality Outcomes, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration” (pp. 323–349)
- Chapter 16, “Patient Engagement and Connected Health” (pp. 357–378)
- Chapter 17, “Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health” (pp. 383–397)
- Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Remote Access Telehealth” (pp. 403–432)
- Benda, N. C., Veinot, T. C., Sieck, C. J., & Ancker, J. S. (2020). Broadband internet access is a social determinant of health!Links to an external site.. American Journal of Public Health, 110(8), 1123-1125. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305784
- Dykes, P. C., Rozenblum, R., Dalal, A., Massaro, A., Chang, F., Clements, M., Collins, S. …Bates, D. W. (2017). Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study Download Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study. Critical Care Medicine, 45 (8), e806–e813. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002449
- HealthIT.gov. (2018c). What is an electronic health record (EHR) ?Links to an external site. Retrieved from
https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr - Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018). Leveraging interactive patient care technology to Improve pain management engagementLinks to an external site.. Pain Management Nursing, 19 (3), 212–221.
- Sieck, C. J., Sheon, A., Ancker, J. S., Castek, J., Callahan, B., & Siefer, A. (2021). Digital inclusion as a social determinant of healthLinks to an external site.. NPJ Digital Medicine, 4(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00413-8
- Skiba, D. (2017). Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applicationsLinks to an external site.. Informatics, 4 (3), 32–40.
- Sharma, P., & Patten, C. A. (2022). A need for digitally inclusive health care service in the United States: Recommendations for clinicians and health care systemsLinks to an external site.. Permanente Journal, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/21.156
NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
7/8/25, 11:19 AM Module 4: Week 8: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/173824/assignments/2296999?module_item_id=6934262 1/3
Criteria Ratings Pts
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer- reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:· Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed.
20 pts
· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.
40 pts
· Synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles in a cohesive conclusion.
25 pts
20 to >17.0 pts Excellent The response identifies 4 peer- reviewed research articles for the Assignment.
17 to >15.0 pts Good The response identifies 3 peer- reviewed research articles and one peer- reviewed article for the Assignment.
15 to >13.0 pts Fair The response identifies 4 or less peer-reviewed articles
13 to >0 pts Poor The response identifies less than 4 peer- reviewed articles or peer-reviewed articles are missing
40 to >35.0 pts Excellent The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the response.
35 to >31.0 pts Good The response summarizes each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Accurate examples are provided which support the response provided.
31 to >27.0 pts Fair The response is missing one or two of the required elements or summaries are superficially addressed.
27 to >0 pts Poor The response is missing three or more required elements or the summaries are superficially addressed.
25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Response includes a synthesis of the findings in an exceptionally well-written conclusion.
22 to >19.0 pts Good Response includes a synthesis of the findings in a well- written conclusion.
19 to >17.0 pts Fair The response is missing a synthesis of the findings or the conclusion is superficial.
17 to >0 pts Poor The response is missing a synthesis of the findings and the conclusion is not accurate or is missing.
7/8/25, 11:19 AM Module 4: Week 8: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/173824/assignments/2296999?module_item_id=6934262 2/3
Criteria Ratings Pts
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 to >3.0 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
2 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
7/8/25, 11:19 AM Module 4: Week 8: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/173824/assignments/2296999?module_item_id=6934262 3/3