Endocrine System

Discussion: Endocrine System This assignment is intended to help you learn to analyze and explain the impact of diabetes, and its associated pathological phenomena and details compared to normal physiology. Overview In this assignment, we are going to explore the endocrine system. We’ll also look at diabetes and the role of the master’s prepared nurse in these situations. Action Items 1. Respond to the following in your initial post: How and why do stress and infection promote hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes? Give your rationale and substantiate it with references, including your textbook and a minimum of 3 other credible, scholarly sources. 2. Read your classmates’ posts. Go back to your original post. Reply to it and indicate whether you would revise your original thoughts? If so, why? If not, why? Submission Instructions • • By the due date indicated, complete Action Item 1. By Sunday, complete Action Item 2. Grading Criteria Your work will be assessed based on the associated rubric. Read this and all other grading rubrics early on to better understand how you will be assessed and to use that understanding in formulating your responses. Ask for any clarification as needed. kk Discussion: Endocrine System Discussion: Endocrine System Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCase Analysis – Answers and References Ratings 15 to >13.0 pts Fulfills Very clearly explained how and why stress and infection promote hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes. Gave credible rationale for their response. Drew on very pertinent information from the textbook in support of the answers given. Used three or more other very credible and scholarly references in supporting their work. 13 to >11.0 pts Approaching Explained how and why stress and infection promote hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes. Gave some credible rationale for their response. Drew on fairly pertinent information from the textbook in support of the answers given. Used a minimum of three credible and scholarly references in supporting their work. Pts 11 to >0 pts Deficient Did not explain very well how and why stress and infection promote hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes. Gave little to no credible rationale for their response. Drew on weak or irrelevant information from the textbook in support of the answers given. Used fewer than three references or the references used were from popular rather than scholarly sources or were otherwise less than credible. 15 pts Discussion: Endocrine System Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCase Analysis – Reflection on Own Work Ratings 10 to >8.0 pts Fulfills Returned to their own posting and made a reply to their original work. In the reply, very clearly explained what they learned from reading the work of peers. Explained what they would alter in their original work, and why. The rationale given was very strong and persuasive. If they would not change anything, the student justified their decision with very strong and persuasive rationale. 8 to >7.0 pts Approaching Returned to their own posting and made a reply to their original work. In the reply, explained what they learned from reading the work of peers. Explained what they would alter in their original work, and why. If they would not change anything, the student justified their decision. Pts 7 to >0 pts Deficient Did not return to their own posting to make a reply to their original work. Or, in the reply, did not explain very well what they learned from reading the work of peers. Did not explain what they would alter in their original work or tell why, or else their reasoning lacked clarity or persuasion. Or if they would not change anything, the student did not justify their decision or else the justification was very weak.